{rfName}
Er

Licencia y uso

Citaciones

Altmetrics

Análisis de autorías institucional

Batlamous, SouadAutor o CoautorTerron Cuadrado, JuanAutor o CoautorBarreiro Alonso, FernandoAutor o CoautorGlasman Kuguel, Claudia BeatrizAutor o CoautorCueto Gomez, Ana RosarioAutor o CoautorLagouri, TheodotaAutor o CoautorCamarero MuÑoz, DanielAutor o CoautorPrincipe Martin, Miguel AngelAutor o CoautorPascual Dominguez, LuisAutor o CoautorEstevez M.a.Autor o Coautor
Compartir
Publicaciones
>
Corrección

Erratum to: Observation of four-top-quark production in the multilepton final state with the ATLAS detector (Eur. Phys. J. C, (2023), 83, (496), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11573-0)

Publicado en:European Physical Journal c. 84 (2): - 2024-02-01 84(2), DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12458-6

Autores: Aad G; …; Álvarez Estévez, M.; Barreiro, F.; Cueto, A.; Del Peso, J.; Glasman, C.; Príncipe Martín, MA.; Terrón, J.; …; The Atlas Collaboration

Afiliaciones

Academia Sinica, Institute Of Physics - Autor o Coautor
AGH University of Krakow - Autor o Coautor
Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences; Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire - Autor o Coautor
Brandeis University - Autor o Coautor
Brookhaven National Laboratory Physics Department - Autor o Coautor
Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille - Autor o Coautor
Columbia University - Autor o Coautor
Columbia University; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Autor o Coautor
Czech Technical University in Prague - Autor o Coautor
Department of Physics, Lancaster University - Autor o Coautor
Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock - Autor o Coautor
Faculté des Sciences Rabat - Autor o Coautor
Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen - Autor o Coautor
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba - Autor o Coautor
Horia Hulubei National Institute for R&D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering - Autor o Coautor
INFN, Laboratori Nazionali Di Frascati - Autor o Coautor
Institut de Física d'Altes Energies, Bellaterra - Autor o Coautor
Istanbul Universitesi - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare - INFN - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare - INFN; Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics; King's College London - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano; Università degli Studi di Milano - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli; Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pavia; Università degli Studi di Pavia - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale Di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa - Autor o Coautor
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata; Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata" - Autor o Coautor
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz - Autor o Coautor
Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules LAPP - Autor o Coautor
Laboratorio de Instrumentacao e Fisica Experimental de Particulas - Autor o Coautor
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - Autor o Coautor
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München - Autor o Coautor
Lunds universitet - Autor o Coautor
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens - Autor o Coautor
National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) - Autor o Coautor
Northern Illinois University - Autor o Coautor
NYU Tandon School of Engineering - Autor o Coautor
Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire - Autor o Coautor
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Autor o Coautor
Royal Holloway, University of London - Autor o Coautor
Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics - Autor o Coautor
State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection & Electronics - Autor o Coautor
STFC Particle Physics Department - Autor o Coautor
Stockholms universitet; Oskar Klein Centre - Autor o Coautor
Stony Brook University - Autor o Coautor
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology - Autor o Coautor
Technische Universität Dortmund - Autor o Coautor
Tel Aviv University - Autor o Coautor
The University of Edinburgh - Autor o Coautor
The University of Manchester - Autor o Coautor
The University of Oklahoma - Autor o Coautor
The University of Sheffield - Autor o Coautor
The University of Texas at Austin - Autor o Coautor
The University of Tokyo - Autor o Coautor
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Autor o Coautor
Universidad Nacional de la Plata - Autor o Coautor
Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María - Autor o Coautor
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Autor o Coautor
Universitat Bonn - Autor o Coautor
Universitat de València - Autor o Coautor
Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza - Autor o Coautor
UNIVERSITE DE GENEVE - Autor o Coautor
Universite Grenoble Alpes - Autor o Coautor
Université McGill - Autor o Coautor
Université Paris-Saclay - Autor o Coautor
Universiteit van Amsterdam - Autor o Coautor
Universitetet i Oslo - Autor o Coautor
University of Birmingham - Autor o Coautor
University of Liverpool - Autor o Coautor
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor - Autor o Coautor
University of Sussex - Autor o Coautor
University of Toronto - Autor o Coautor
University of Victoria - Autor o Coautor
University of Washington - Autor o Coautor
Waseda University - Autor o Coautor
Weizmann Institute of Science Israel - Autor o Coautor
Ver más

Resumen

Corrections to two figures, one table and the corresponding numbers in the text are noted for the paper. Systematic uncertainties arising from the comparison of the nominal tt¯tt¯ simulation with alternative samples generated with Sherpa and with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Herwig7 were not applied when deriving limits on the top-quark Yukawa coupling, Higgs oblique parameter and EFT operators. This affects Figs. 8 and 9, and Table 8. (Figure presented.) (Figure presented.) (Table presented.) Two-dimensional negative log-likelihood contours for |κtcos(α)| versus |κtsin(α)| at 68% and 95%, where κt is the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling strength parameter and α is the mixing angle between the CP-even and CP-odd components. The gradient-shaded area represents the observed likelihood value as a function of κt and α. Both the tt¯tt¯ signal and tt¯H background yields in each fitted bin are parameterised as a function of κt and α. The blue cross shows the SM expectation, while the black cross shows the best fit value The negative log-likelihood values as a function of the Higgs oblique parameter H^. The solid line represents the observed likelihood while the dashed line corresponds to the expected one. The dashed region shows the non-unitary regime Expected and observed 95% CL intervals on EFT coupling parameters assuming one EFT parameter variation in the fit Operators Expected Ci/Λ2 [TeV -2] Observed Ci/Λ2 [TeV -2] OQQ1 [-2.5,3.2] [-4.0,4.5] OQt1 [-2.6,2.1] [-3.8,3.4] Ott1 [-1.2,1.4] [-1.9,2.1] OQt8 [-4.3,5.1] [-6.9,7.6] The changes in the text are noted for Sects. 9.1, 9.2 and 10. In Sect. 9.1, for the case when the tt¯tt¯ and tt¯H yields in each bin of the GNN distribution are parameterised as a function of κt and α and fixing the top-quark Yukawa coupling to be CP-even only, the observed limit is |κt|<1.9 instead of |κt|<1.8. If the tt¯H background yields are not parametrised, whilst the normalisation of the tt¯H background is treated as a free parameter of the fit, the observed (expected) limit is |κt|<2.3 (1.9) instead of |κt|<2.2 (1.8). In Sect. 9.2, the upper limits on the absolute values of the coefficients (|Ci/Λ2|) of OQQ1, OQt1, Ott1 and OQt8 assuming only the linear terms are 6.6, 4.0, 2.8 and 10.8 TeV -2, respectively, at 95% CL instead of 5.3, 3.3, 2.4 and 8.8 TeV -2. In Sect. 9.2, the observed (expected) upper limit on the H^ parameter is 0.23 (0.11) at 95% CL instead of 0.20 (0.12). The published expected upper limit of 0.12 was a mistake in the text and should have been 0.1 corresponding to the likelihood scan in Fig. 9. The observed limit is weaker than the largest value of this parameter equal to 0.2 that preserves unitarity in the perturbative theory. In Sect. 10, assuming a pure CP-even coupling (α=0), the observed upper limit on |κt|=|yt/ytSM| at 95% CL is 1.9 instead of 1.8. Assuming one operator taking effect at a time, the observed constraints on the coefficients (Ci/Λ2) of OQQ1, OQt1, Ott1 and OQt8 are [-4.0,4.5], [-3.8,3.4], [-1.9,2.1] and [-6.9,7.6] TeV -2, respectively. An observed upper limit at 95% CL of 0.23 is obtained for the Higgs oblique parameter that is weaker than the largest value that preserves unitarity in the perturbative theory. In Sect. 9.1, for the case when the tt¯tt¯ and tt¯H yields in each bin of the GNN distribution are parameterised as a function of κt and α and fixing the top-quark Yukawa coupling to be CP-even only, the observed limit is |κt|<1.9 instead of |κt|<1.8. If the tt¯H background yields are not parametrised, whilst the normalisation of the tt¯H background is treated as a free parameter of the fit, the observed (expected) limit is |κt|<2.3 (1.9) instead of |κt|<2.2 (1.8). In Sect. 9.2, the upper limits on the absolute values of the coefficients (|Ci/Λ2|) of OQQ1, OQt1, Ott1 and OQt8 assuming only the linear terms are 6.6, 4.0, 2.8 and 10.8 TeV -2, respectively, at 95% CL instead of 5.3, 3.3, 2.4 and 8.8 TeV -2. In Sect. 9.2, the observed (expected) upper limit on the H^ parameter is 0.23 (0.11) at 95% CL instead of 0.20 (0.12). The published expected upper limit of 0.12 was a mistake in the text and should have been 0.1 corresponding to the likelihood scan in Fig. 9. The observed limit is weaker than the largest value of this parameter equal to 0.2 that preserves unitarity in the perturbative theory. In Sect. 10, assuming a pure CP-even coupling (α=0), the observed upper limit on |κt|=|yt/ytSM| at 95% CL is 1.9 instead of 1.8. Assuming one operator taking effect at a time, the observed constraints on the coefficients (Ci/Λ2) of OQQ1, OQt1, Ott1 and OQt8 are [-4.0,4.5], [-3.8,3.4], [-1.9,2.1] and [-6.9,7.6] TeV -2, respectively. An observed upper limit at 95% CL of 0.23 is obtained for the Higgs oblique parameter that is weaker than the largest value that preserves unitarity in the perturbative theory.

Palabras clave
Astronomia / físicaBiotecnologíaEngenharias iiiEngenharias ivEngineering (miscellaneous)EnsinoInterdisciplinarMatemática / probabilidade e estatísticaPhysics and astronomy (miscellaneous)Physics, particles & fields

Indicios de calidad

Impacto bibliométrico. Análisis de la aportación y canal de difusión

El trabajo ha sido publicado en la revista European Physical Journal c debido a la progresión y el buen impacto que ha alcanzado en los últimos años, según la agencia Scopus (SJR), se ha convertido en una referencia en su campo. En el año de publicación del trabajo, 2024 aún no existen indicios calculados, pero en 2023, se encontraba en la posición , consiguiendo con ello situarse como revista Q1 (Primer Cuartil), en la categoría Engineering (Miscellaneous). Destacable, igualmente, el hecho de que la Revista está posicionada por encima del Percentil 90.

Impacto y visibilidad social

Desde la dimensión de Influencia o adopción social, y tomando como base las métricas asociadas a las menciones e interacciones proporcionadas por agencias especializadas en el cálculo de las denominadas “Métricas Alternativas o Sociales”, podemos destacar a fecha 2025-05-09:

  • La utilización de esta aportación en marcadores, bifurcaciones de código, añadidos a listas de favoritos para una lectura recurrente, así como visualizaciones generales, indica que alguien está usando la publicación como base de su trabajo actual. Esto puede ser un indicador destacado de futuras citas más formales y académicas. Tal afirmación es avalada por el resultado del indicador “Capture” que arroja un total de: 5 (PlumX).

Es fundamental presentar evidencias que respalden la plena alineación con los principios y directrices institucionales en torno a la Ciencia Abierta y la Conservación y Difusión del Patrimonio Intelectual. Un claro ejemplo de ello es:

  • El trabajo se ha enviado a una revista cuya política editorial permite la publicación en abierto Open Access.
  • Además, el trabajo se ha enviado a una revista clasificada como Diamante en relación con este tipo de política editorial.
Análisis de liderazgo de los autores institucionales

Este trabajo se ha realizado con colaboración internacional, concretamente con investigadores de: Argentina; Azerbaijan; Brazil; Canada; Chile; China; Czech Republic; France; Germany; Greece; Israel; Italy; Japan; Morocco; Netherlands; Norway; Poland; Portugal; Sweden; Switzerland; Taiwan; Turkey; United Kingdom; United States of America.