Publications
>
Correction

Erratum to: Observation of four-top-quark production in the multilepton final state with the ATLAS detector (Eur. Phys. J. C, (2023), 83, (496), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11573-0)

Publicated to:European Physical Journal c. 84 (2): - 2024-02-01 84(2), DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12458-6

Authors: Aad G; …; Álvarez Estévez, M.; Barreiro, F.; Cueto, A.; Del Peso, J.; Glasman, C.; Príncipe Martín, MA.; Terrón, J.; …; The Atlas Collaboration

Affiliations

Academia Sinica, Institute Of Physics - Author
AGH University of Krakow - Author
Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences; Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire - Author
Brandeis University - Author
Brookhaven National Laboratory Physics Department - Author
Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille - Author
Columbia University - Author
Columbia University; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Author
Czech Technical University in Prague - Author
Department of Physics, Lancaster University - Author
Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock - Author
Faculté des Sciences Rabat - Author
Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen - Author
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba - Author
Horia Hulubei National Institute for R&D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering - Author
INFN, Laboratori Nazionali Di Frascati - Author
Institut de Física d'Altes Energies, Bellaterra - Author
Istanbul Universitesi - Author
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare - INFN - Author
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare - INFN; Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics; King's College London - Author
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna - Author
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano - Author
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano; Università degli Studi di Milano - Author
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli; Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II - Author
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pavia; Università degli Studi di Pavia - Author
Istituto Nazionale Di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa - Author
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata; Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata" - Author
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz - Author
Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules LAPP - Author
Laboratorio de Instrumentacao e Fisica Experimental de Particulas - Author
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - Author
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München - Author
Lunds universitet - Author
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens - Author
National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) - Author
Northern Illinois University - Author
NYU Tandon School of Engineering - Author
Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire - Author
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Author
Royal Holloway, University of London - Author
Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics - Author
State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection & Electronics - Author
STFC Particle Physics Department - Author
Stockholms universitet; Oskar Klein Centre - Author
Stony Brook University - Author
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology - Author
Technische Universität Dortmund - Author
Tel Aviv University - Author
The University of Edinburgh - Author
The University of Manchester - Author
The University of Oklahoma - Author
The University of Sheffield - Author
The University of Texas at Austin - Author
The University of Tokyo - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author
Universidad Nacional de la Plata - Author
Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María - Author
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Author
Universitat Bonn - Author
Universitat de València - Author
Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza - Author
UNIVERSITE DE GENEVE - Author
Universite Grenoble Alpes - Author
Université McGill - Author
Université Paris-Saclay - Author
Universiteit van Amsterdam - Author
Universitetet i Oslo - Author
University of Birmingham - Author
University of Liverpool - Author
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor - Author
University of Sussex - Author
University of Toronto - Author
University of Victoria - Author
University of Washington - Author
Waseda University - Author
Weizmann Institute of Science Israel - Author
See more

Abstract

Corrections to two figures, one table and the corresponding numbers in the text are noted for the paper. Systematic uncertainties arising from the comparison of the nominal tt¯tt¯ simulation with alternative samples generated with Sherpa and with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Herwig7 were not applied when deriving limits on the top-quark Yukawa coupling, Higgs oblique parameter and EFT operators. This affects Figs. 8 and 9, and Table 8. (Figure presented.) (Figure presented.) (Table presented.) Two-dimensional negative log-likelihood contours for |κtcos(α)| versus |κtsin(α)| at 68% and 95%, where κt is the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling strength parameter and α is the mixing angle between the CP-even and CP-odd components. The gradient-shaded area represents the observed likelihood value as a function of κt and α. Both the tt¯tt¯ signal and tt¯H background yields in each fitted bin are parameterised as a function of κt and α. The blue cross shows the SM expectation, while the black cross shows the best fit value The negative log-likelihood values as a function of the Higgs oblique parameter H^. The solid line represents the observed likelihood while the dashed line corresponds to the expected one. The dashed region shows the non-unitary regime Expected and observed 95% CL intervals on EFT coupling parameters assuming one EFT parameter variation in the fit Operators Expected Ci/Λ2 [TeV -2] Observed Ci/Λ2 [TeV -2] OQQ1 [-2.5,3.2] [-4.0,4.5] OQt1 [-2.6,2.1] [-3.8,3.4] Ott1 [-1.2,1.4] [-1.9,2.1] OQt8 [-4.3,5.1] [-6.9,7.6] The changes in the text are noted for Sects. 9.1, 9.2 and 10. In Sect. 9.1, for the case when the tt¯tt¯ and tt¯H yields in each bin of the GNN distribution are parameterised as a function of κt and α and fixing the top-quark Yukawa coupling to be CP-even only, the observed limit is |κt|<1.9 instead of |κt|<1.8. If the tt¯H background yields are not parametrised, whilst the normalisation of the tt¯H background is treated as a free parameter of the fit, the observed (expected) limit is |κt|<2.3 (1.9) instead of |κt|<2.2 (1.8). In Sect. 9.2, the upper limits on the absolute values of the coefficients (|Ci/Λ2|) of OQQ1, OQt1, Ott1 and OQt8 assuming only the linear terms are 6.6, 4.0, 2.8 and 10.8 TeV -2, respectively, at 95% CL instead of 5.3, 3.3, 2.4 and 8.8 TeV -2. In Sect. 9.2, the observed (expected) upper limit on the H^ parameter is 0.23 (0.11) at 95% CL instead of 0.20 (0.12). The published expected upper limit of 0.12 was a mistake in the text and should have been 0.1 corresponding to the likelihood scan in Fig. 9. The observed limit is weaker than the largest value of this parameter equal to 0.2 that preserves unitarity in the perturbative theory. In Sect. 10, assuming a pure CP-even coupling (α=0), the observed upper limit on |κt|=|yt/ytSM| at 95% CL is 1.9 instead of 1.8. Assuming one operator taking effect at a time, the observed constraints on the coefficients (Ci/Λ2) of OQQ1, OQt1, Ott1 and OQt8 are [-4.0,4.5], [-3.8,3.4], [-1.9,2.1] and [-6.9,7.6] TeV -2, respectively. An observed upper limit at 95% CL of 0.23 is obtained for the Higgs oblique parameter that is weaker than the largest value that preserves unitarity in the perturbative theory. In Sect. 9.1, for the case when the tt¯tt¯ and tt¯H yields in each bin of the GNN distribution are parameterised as a function of κt and α and fixing the top-quark Yukawa coupling to be CP-even only, the observed limit is |κt|<1.9 instead of |κt|<1.8. If the tt¯H background yields are not parametrised, whilst the normalisation of the tt¯H background is treated as a free parameter of the fit, the observed (expected) limit is |κt|<2.3 (1.9) instead of |κt|<2.2 (1.8). In Sect. 9.2, the upper limits on the absolute values of the coefficients (|Ci/Λ2|) of OQQ1, OQt1, Ott1 and OQt8 assuming only the linear terms are 6.6, 4.0, 2.8 and 10.8 TeV -2, respectively, at 95% CL instead of 5.3, 3.3, 2.4 and 8.8 TeV -2. In Sect. 9.2, the observed (expected) upper limit on the H^ parameter is 0.23 (0.11) at 95% CL instead of 0.20 (0.12). The published expected upper limit of 0.12 was a mistake in the text and should have been 0.1 corresponding to the likelihood scan in Fig. 9. The observed limit is weaker than the largest value of this parameter equal to 0.2 that preserves unitarity in the perturbative theory. In Sect. 10, assuming a pure CP-even coupling (α=0), the observed upper limit on |κt|=|yt/ytSM| at 95% CL is 1.9 instead of 1.8. Assuming one operator taking effect at a time, the observed constraints on the coefficients (Ci/Λ2) of OQQ1, OQt1, Ott1 and OQt8 are [-4.0,4.5], [-3.8,3.4], [-1.9,2.1] and [-6.9,7.6] TeV -2, respectively. An observed upper limit at 95% CL of 0.23 is obtained for the Higgs oblique parameter that is weaker than the largest value that preserves unitarity in the perturbative theory.

Keywords
Astronomia / físicaBiotecnologíaEngenharias iiiEngenharias ivEngineering (miscellaneous)EnsinoInterdisciplinarMatemática / probabilidade e estatísticaPhysics and astronomy (miscellaneous)Physics, particles & fields

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal European Physical Journal c due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2024 there are still no calculated indicators, but in 2023, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Engineering (Miscellaneous). Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-09:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 5 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Argentina; Azerbaijan; Brazil; Canada; Chile; China; Czech Republic; France; Germany; Greece; Israel; Italy; Japan; Morocco; Netherlands; Norway; Poland; Portugal; Sweden; Switzerland; Taiwan; Turkey; United Kingdom; United States of America.