{rfName}
Ep

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Santamaría DlAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Epistemic injustice

Publicated to:Eunomía: Revista En Cultura De La Legalidad. (24): 274-299 - 2023-04-01 (24), DOI: 10.20318/eunomia.2023.7667

Authors: Santamaría DL

Affiliations

Abstract

Miranda Fricker’s conceptualization of epistemic injustice in 2007 has promoted the discussion about this kind of problematic in areas such as political epistemology and social philosophy. In spite of the proliferation of theoretical studies concerning the diverse types of epistemic injustice, it seems that this construction has not had an impact in the iusphilosophical area. This paper aims to offer a conceptual map of the theory of epistemic injustice, fundamentally through the study of Fricker’s work and with the help of the secondary literature elaborated as a result of its publication. In this way, it will attempt to bring this theoretical construction closer to the field of Law, pointing out the aspects in which it can be useful, while posing some possible unknowns about it.

Keywords

AgencyDiscriminationEpistemic injusticeHermeneutical injusticeKnowledgeRecognitionTestimonial injusticeTestimony

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 8.37, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 256.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 347 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 5.9.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 8 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (LATOVA SANTAMARIA, DIANA ROSA) and Last Author (LATOVA SANTAMARIA, DIANA ROSA).