{rfName}
Cl

Indexed in

Analysis of institutional authors

Arranz Martin, Jose AlfonsoAuthor

Share

September 15, 2025
Publications
>
Article
No

Clinical and prognostic differences in diabetic ketoacidosis between type 2 and type 1 diabetes

Publicated to: Medicina Clinica. 165 (1): 1 - 8 - 2025-01-01 165(1), DOI:

Authors:

María Tapia Sanchiz; Victor Navas Moreno; Marta López Ruano; Carmen Martínez Otero; Elena Carrillo López; Carolina Sager La Ganga; Juan José Raposo López; Selma Amar; Sara González Castañar; José Alfonso Arranz Martín; Mónica Marazuela Azpiroz; Fernando Sebastian Valles
[+]

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and type 1 diabetes (T1D) in a Spanish cohort. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study included all cases of DKA between 2010 and 2024 in a Spanish tertiary hospital. Clinical and laboratory variables were collected to identify differences between DKA in T2D and T1D. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate 30-day mortality following a DKA event. Results A total of 249 subjects (52.2% female) with a mean age of 50.2 ± 19.9 years were included. Eighty-nine patients (35.7%) had T2D, and 160 (64.3%) had T1D. A higher proportion of cardiovascular precipitating events was observed in the T2D group (12.5% vs. 3.2%; P=.005), along with a more favorable blood gas profile, characterized by higher pH, bicarbonate levels, and lower ketone body concentrations (P<.05). However, 30-day mortality was 13.5% in T2D and 1.3% in T1D (P<.001). Logistic regression models identified cardiovascular events, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and higher urea levels as predictors of mortality (P<.05), independent of age and diabetes type. Conclusion DKA in T2D is associated with a higher risk of mortality due to the severity of precipitating factors, despite a more favorable blood gas profile compared to T1D. Early identification of episodes is essential to prevent complications.
[+]

Keywords

Ciencias de la saludCiencias de la salud. generalidadesMedicina clínica

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal MEDICINA CLINICA due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position 95/332, thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Medicine, General & Internal. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q3 para la agencia Scopus (SJR) en la categoría Medicine (Miscellaneous).

[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (ARRANZ MARTIN, JOSE ALFONSO).

[+]